tommo: (Default)
[personal profile] tommo
I was going to post this as a reply on someone else's journal, but I think it's an interesting enough point to be a post of it's own.

I've been wondering whether the job of programmer should really be divided up further than it currently is. Have a head programmer to run and timetable the whole thing and generally be in charge, but then have sub-programmers responsible for different streams. You could have a media fan organising some TV and movie panels, a lit fan organising some book panels, avid gamer for gaming panels, anime buff for anime panels, and so on. And the head programmer gives them each a certain number of panel slots they have to fill up. I think that could result in a much more well-balanced programme.

What do people think? It'd swell the numbers in a committee somewhat, but I think if it was done well and everyone involved put in the required effort, you'd probably end up with a stellar programme. And it'd take some of the burden away from the head programmer, who tends to do a hell of a lot of work putting it all together.

Date: 2009-04-16 04:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cheshirenoir.livejournal.com
The big problem I see is we barely get enough committee volunteers to run a minimalist convention, let alone one with multiple programmers...

Date: 2009-04-16 04:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tommmo.livejournal.com
Sure, it's going to be harder to find half a dozen people than just one, but with the appropriate leg-work being done well in advance, I think it'd be achievable.

Also, people will probably be happier to volunteer if their job is smaller and quite clearly defined. Hardly anyone ever wants to be programmer, but "comics sub-programmer" doesn't sound like nearly as much bother.

Date: 2009-04-16 04:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cheshirenoir.livejournal.com
Guess I have been on one too many dysfunctional Swancon committees :-)

Date: 2009-04-16 04:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angriest.livejournal.com
Me too.

Sometimes the same ones.

That said, I'd certainly be much more likely to put my hand up if the requirement was "find people and topics to fill these 25 slots" than I would to do a committee position wholesale.

Date: 2009-04-16 04:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tommmo.livejournal.com
Haha, yes, that'll certainly taint your view of things :)

It'd be a difficult experiment, but if it worked I think the resulting programme would be really, really good. The reason we get so many "Intro to Anime" panels is because we have lots of programmers who don't know about anime. Imagine how great it'd be having a knowledgable anime fan organising the (and I'm picking a random number here) 6 anime panels you want in the programme. It really has the potential to deliver a programme with no oversights and minimal filler.

Profile

tommo: (Default)
tommo

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3 4 567 89
1011121314 1516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 12:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios