Date: 2009-04-15 08:23 am (UTC)
Some questions:

Do we want to move away from our fannish side? Isn't that what makes us unique?

If not, what makes Swancon different from Ghengiscon, Waicon and Supernova? (If we don't differentiate ourselves, they'll eat our lunch! We can't compete on size or cost.)

Swancon is a formula we exported east on several occasions. What has changed to make this a sub-optimum formula?

If we're growing at a nrate matching or exceeding population growth, are we failing?

Do we face a risk of diluting that which makes it feel like family for so many of us by growing too fast? (This complaint was levelled against Gothcon 1 AKA Swancon 21.)

I'm not saying what you are proposing is wrong, I just don't want us to go too far :-)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

tommo: (Default)
tommo

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3 4 567 89
1011121314 1516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 02:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios